1. Sad state of Can. science journalism demonstrated by National Post losing climate change defamation suit as well as Star's Gardasil story
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. Unless I missed something, this story isn't being widely discussed in Canadian media circles:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-mla-andrew-weaver-wins-defamation-suit-against-national-post/article22850470/ …
1 reply 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. National Post lost lawsuit because Weaver sued, but lawsuit covers only part of paper's problem on climate.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Michael Mann & other climate scientists probably also have grounds to sue Post, but they (lucky for Post) have bigger things to deal with
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. The fact is, the Post's coverage of climate, particularly in op ed and Financial Post is scandalously bad and dishonest.
1 reply 8 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Andrew Coyne, comments editor at Post, is on record as believing science on climate isn't settled. Is receptive to denialist voices.
2 replies 6 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. We take Post's oddness for granted so no longer think about ow odd it is that a national paper is deeply at odds with mainstream science
3 replies 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet Sure Jeet. Here is 50 years of "mainstream science" about to be shelved. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/cholesterol-guidelines-foods-back-table/story?id=28890189 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SevenSharpNine The fact that science is open to revision is to its credit, not discredit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.