Awed by Immense sophistry used to defend Sullivan on Bell Curve and Kinsley on anti-Palestinian editorials.
-
-
Replying to @DaveMazella
@DaveMazella@HeerJeet Sullivan on the The Bell Curve isn't hard to defend. It stacks up well. See@cfchabris review. http://www.chabris.com/Chabris1998a.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Biorealism
@Biorealism@DaveMazella@cfchabris Commentary magazine? Really?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet Chabris was Ph.D. candidate at Harvard specializing in cognitive neuroscience at the time. Now Prof.@DaveMazella@cfchabris2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Biorealism
@Biorealism@DaveMazella@cfchabris Norman Podhoretz, Commentary editor, once said the sight of an inter-racial couple sickened him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet Guilt by association? Poisoning the well? Not exactly intellectually honest ways to address Chabris.@DaveMazella@cfchabris1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Biorealism
@Biorealism@DaveMazella@cfchabris You stick with your friends who loath inter-racial couples and I'll stick with the sources I cited.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet I cited something Chabris wrote. Please don't make these kind of bad faith smears.@DaveMazella@cfchabris1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Biorealism @DaveMazella @cfchabris Commentary magazine has a history on race which is pertinent to judging articles in it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.