1. So. I have a big piece in the next @tnr about the magazine's history and race. It's not out yet but I would advise a little patience.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. A suggestion: people should refrain from forming strong opinions (pro or con) before they read the article. It's long & (I think) nuanced
9 replies 5 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. This is pure coincidence but my TNR piece can usefully be read as a partial response to
@jonathanchait's political correctness article2 replies 4 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. I was hoping that my
@tnr piece would also provoke a long piece by@sullydish. But probably won't.2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. While you are waiting for my
@tnr piece, you can read my conflicted thoughts on Andrew Sullivan: https://storify.com/JeetHeer1/andrew-sullivan-s-the-dish-rip …1 reply 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Now that my
@tnr piece is online, I want to give huge props to@gabrielsnyder &@chrishughes for publishing it.1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. I would love to see, say, National Review do a similarly honest appraisal of its history. It never has, to date.
5 replies 5 retweets 7 likes
9. But it's not just about race. TNR (and other institutions) can reflect on ways they've been shaped by sexism, homophobia, etc.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. Should add that in writing the piece, enormously helped by great TNR team, especially
@hellogangster &@ClaireGroden0 replies 3 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.