28. But beyond doing a good & bad balance sheet, perhaps the best way to think about The Dish is as a literary form.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
29. I've talked about trigger essays as real time thinking, but an obvious precursor is Sullivan-style blogging.
1 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
30. What held "The Dish" together despite variety of subjects and changes of mind? Nothing more than Sullivan's writerly voice.
3 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
31. Sullivan's best blog posts were essays in the classic sense: essaying a topic, thinking out loud, arguing with himself.
1 reply 4 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
32. You do get a sense from Sullivan that however wrong he is on something, he is genuinely open to being challenged & re-thinking.
6 replies 9 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
33. Aside from being ideal vehicle for his own writerly voice, The Dish allowed Sullivan to mentor cohort of younger writers.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
34. Sullivan opened up The Dish to lots of great writers including
@michelledean,@tanehisicoates, &@mattyglesias1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
35. In fact, I'd argue that Sullivan's "editing" of The Dish (selection of guest editors) far superior to his editing of TNR.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
36. Editing a magazine like TNR, Sullivan didn't realize that by publishing an article he was giving it stamp of authority.
10 replies 4 retweets 5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.