1. As it happens, I've been thinking a lot about Andrew Sullivan over the last few weeks while working on a long New Republic history.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. Sullivan is a complicated figure, one I've had many arguments over with friends. I want to discuss the good and the bad.
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Let's start with the good. As far as I know, he was the first openly gay editor of a national American magazine, at least a political.
1 reply 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Sullivan's role in pushing gay marriage to the front of the national agenda is important, although it needs some specification.
1 reply 4 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. Contra his uncritical celebrators, Sullivan wasn't the main force for marriage equality, which came from gay activist community he hated
3 replies 7 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. On marriage equality, Sullivan's achievement was he frame issue in way that made it palatable for centrist and center-right
1 reply 6 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. The energy for marriage came from activists left, but path to victory made easier by acceptance of people like Walter Olson & GOP judges
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. People like Walter Olson & GOP judges amenable to Sullivan's conservative framing of marriage equality. Winning them was his achievement
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes
@notjessewalker yeah, Ted Olson. Mea culpa.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.