41. Also, if you still want to be a "paper of record" maybe not have a star columnist who is a plagiarist & climate denialist.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
42. Okay, that's a wrap. Another day, another bridge burned to a crisp.
16 replies 4 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
43. Postscript to the Houpt/Brown twitter essay: It's a fair point that Brown is a big enough figure that he deserves scrutiny & criticism.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
44. As mentioned I thought Houpt was right on Brown on Levant. I'm agnostic about criticism of Brown on Lang. We need more facts.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
45. So the point isn't, Brown shouldn't be criticized, but that such criticism shouldn't come from place of Legacy Media superiority.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
46. I hope
@simonhoupt returns to the@JesseBrown file because there are real questions to ask about the crowd-source model of journalism1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
47. I worry crowd-sourcing model will encourage demagoguery. Journalists gets funding by casting themselves as underdog fighting big boys
2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
48. And I don't know how sustainable crowd-sourcing is in long run. Although I suppose I.F. Stone was crowd-sourced for decades...
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
49. And crowd-funding feels like begging ... but maybe I'm just getting old.
6 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@CharsBooks Like I said, I might just be an old stodgy on this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.