Since we don't know what the Prophet Mohammed actually looked like, an image of him is only an image if artist says it is.
@studentactivism Yeah, I think that's true in this case. But some claim all representations are blasphemy.
-
-
@HeerJeet True. But if you really wanted to strike a blow for principled blasphemy, you'd publish respectful but "blasphemous" images. -
@studentactivism Interesting argument. I think the cover of the new issue of CH can count as respectful blasphemy. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.