11. So if we can't rely on Sony & Co. to take a stance for free speech, what options do we have?
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
12.
@jonathanchait suggests USA gov't underwrite Sony liability on terrorist attack:http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/us-must-defend-us-culture-from-north-korea.html …3 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
13. I'm not sure what I think of Chait's suggestion actually, since it would involve extending sphere of state anti-terrorism activity.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
14. A more democratic & grassroot solution would be a consumer boycott of Sony, until they release film.
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
15. Defending free speech of crappy Hollywood movie might seem like a dubious political stance....
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
18. RT
@zrahul2020 Hollywood have the Chinese Govt at the back of their mind while creating movies , Nobody is complaining about that3 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
19. As last 3 RTs make clear, defending free speech of Hollywood is itself dubious since industry already compromised.
4 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
20. And salutary discovery in whole process is peak behind curtain to see terrible Hollywood is on host of issues.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
21. RT @TheIronRobot Govts already ban individuals from paying ransom for family members on grounds that it encourages terrorism. 1/2
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
22. RT @TheIronRobot By comparison, insuring or reimbursing a company to achieve the same security goal doesn't seem like an extension to me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
23. So, no real answers on this, more like a set of issues to think through.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.