20. Neo-cons like McConnell, Midge Decter, & Michael Ledeen had access to TNR through back-channel: Martin Peretz.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
21. If neo-cons had article they wanted to impress on a national audience of Dems, they'd send it to Peretz, who'd foist it on magazine.
1 reply 5 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
22. The neo-con back-channel that McConnell describes provides a crucial insight into the infamous Bell Curve issue of TNR.
1 reply 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
23. In 1980s, Peretz's impulse to push neo-con ideas got blunted by editors, particularly Hertzberg.
2 replies 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
24. But in Andrew Sullivan, Peretz finally found a compliant editor who shared basically conservative outlook.
1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
25. For purposes of Murray and AEI, it wasn't sufficient that he publish just in Commentary or National Review.
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
26. Murray and his wealthy sponsors wanted him to be seen as a legitimate public intellectual with national reach -- i.e. published in TNR
3 replies 7 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
27. With the Bell Curve, the entire staff of The New Republic was opposed to publishing. Only Sullivan and Peretz wanted to publish it.
3 replies 8 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
28. Sullivan & Peretz had final say & Bell Curve published in TNR. The neo-con front stronger than ostensibly liberal soul of magazine.
4 replies 4 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet I suppose I shouldn't hold my breath for@sullydish to do a deep dish "I Was Wrong" re: The Bell Curve....?#butagirlcandream1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
@marta_rose @sullydish Don't hold your breath unless you want to go blue in the face.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.