@tanehisicoates @yeselson @jazzman999 Depends which 19th century Republicans you're talking about! They were certainly anti-Radical.
-
-
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Then again, many abolitionists opposed full black male suffrage, until political advantage clear.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 By 1874, the right-wingers of The Nation were endorsing violence in the South!pic.twitter.com/GRWbVQg9sf
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Yeah, you're right. By '72, mag editorializing that blacks had to fix own problems.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 They were skeptical against the actual workers of the land much earlier.pic.twitter.com/bMDXdbJMW7
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@yeselson@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Anyone here read Heather Cox Richardson's DEATH OF RECONSTRUCTION?2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Heather, jump in.@HC_Richardson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@HeerJeet@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 1870-1871 is huge in linking black voters to redist of wealth. A game changer.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HC_Richardson
@yeselson@HeerJeet@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Fear is poor black voters + labor want big gov't programs, paid for by taxes3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@HC_Richardson Thanks! Makes total sense. Your book came heavily recommended by @ckilpatrick
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.