@tanehisicoates @yeselson @jazzman999 Depends which 19th century Republicans you're talking about! They were certainly anti-Radical.
-
-
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Then again, many abolitionists opposed full black male suffrage, until political advantage clear.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 By 1874, the right-wingers of The Nation were endorsing violence in the South!pic.twitter.com/GRWbVQg9sf
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 Yeah, you're right. By '72, mag editorializing that blacks had to fix own problems.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@tanehisicoates@jazzman999 They were skeptical against the actual workers of the land much earlier.pic.twitter.com/bMDXdbJMW7
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@EricKleefeld @yeselson @tanehisicoates @jazzman999 I haven't read it myself yet but it comes recommended, curious if anyone knows it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.