2. Levant's lawyer made an intriguing (but unsuccessful argument): that Levant's readers would not take his comments "at face value"
-
-
-
3. Why? Because readers would be aware of Levant's "penchant to stir controversy and make outlandish comments."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet interesting. Curious about whether Canadian libel law is as pro-plaintiff as UK's -
@MichaelMcGough3 It used to be but under recent Supreme Court decision it is much closer to USA model.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet FYI, did you see this libel suit in South Africa? A puppet sued for calling someone a racist: http://jonathanturley.org/2014/11/11/free-speech-for-dummies-south-african-court-silences-puppets-tweets-as-possible-hate-speech/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lpdstock
@HeerJeet I don't believe he _can't_ pay his bills.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Sun news certainly speaks to and ignites the conservative base but the base won't get them elected, it will raise lots of $ thoughThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.