@joshtpm Which is why (along with conflicting witnesses) that case should be tried by jury, not terminated at grand jury stage.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cosplayhassid
@cosplayhassid Fun fact: in a democracy, citizens don't have to cower before public officials but can criticize them.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cosplayhassid
@cosplayhassid Idea that prosecutors can't be criticized by non-lawyers is profoundly undemocratic. All gov't officials can be criticized1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cosplayhassid
@cosplayhassid No, if you have conflicting witnesses it's up for trial to determine who telling truth, not grand jury.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cosplayhassid
@cosplayhassid In any case, the point I've making here is not original to me but made by many others, including by lawyers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @cosplayhassid
@cosplayhassid Um, if it had gone to trial, who would the defense be defending?
10:58 PM - 25 Nov 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.