33. In era where USA was being criticized by liberals & left for being insufficiently democracy, Burnham & Kendall offered counter-narrative
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
34. "Caesarism" is way of critiquing American polity for becoming too democratic, too responsive to popular will.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
35. "Caesarism" implies a paradise of republican perfection that we've fallen from. Hence a useful conservative idea.
3 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
36. Finally, "Caesarism" blames foreign policy over-reach on ambitious executive, not on more deeply entrenched imperial system.
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
37. Although I oppose many of the policies
@DouthatNYT mentions, I think Caesarism is not at all a useful term to help analyze them.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
38. Are we concerned just about the Imperial Presidency or with the American Empire?
3 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
39. A Caesarist analysis personalizes problems, turning focus to fault of over-weening executive, as
@DouthatNYT does in column.3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Jeet Heer Retweeted Jeet Heer
40. Here is
@douthat responding to an earlier jibe I made on this topic:https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/536549095892987905 …Jeet Heer added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
41. Problem with
@DouthatNYT's response is while column does talk about foreign policy it doesn't have systemic critique. No imperialism2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@DouthatNYT You can't understand Caesarism w/o looking at what Burnham & Kendall were for: legislative govt.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ToryAnarchist @DouthatNYT Fair point. B & K valuable ss critics of mid-century liberals who fetishized presidency.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.