2. I want to supplement @tanehisicoates's comments.
-
-
-
3. There is a big difference between what we can reasonably surmise and what a court decides is truth.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Dan_E_Solo@tanehisicoates Cesarini went too far with available evidence, I think, but there's enough to take a dire view of Koestler.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@punningpundit
@tanehisicoates I'm sure it happened but also sure it was rare.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dookama It's a tough question. They should aim for at the very least allowing no untruth. Not sure if they can do more than that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dookama Okay, I do think we should have higher expectations. They do as you say go after convenient investigative targets.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WorkingCollar No, legal system isn't omniscient, which is why our sense of what's true relies on more than just legal system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WorkingCollar If anyone is being punished (shoot em all) then I want legal system. This is more about evaluating claims without punishment
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dookama Agreed. It's a profound question and one with no ready solution, certainly no agreed upon one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@root_e@tanehisicoates Yeah, I assumed that was the case but didn't want to make a categorical statement without knowing facts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.