@evankindley @HeerJeet as a non-historian working in cognitive theory aesthetic form, who can't use Empson or Richards as references because
-
-
Replying to @peligrietzer
@evankindley@HeerJeet people get the wrong idea if they see these names, I want a history of how New Criticism changed orientation and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peligrietzer
@evankindley@HeerJeet reputation from (mostly) speculative cog sci of Baumgartenian aesthetics to 'close reading good for soul'1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @peligrietzer
@evankindley@HeerJeet Brooks and Leavis and then later Bloom sealing the deal?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peligrietzer
@peligrietzer@evankindley Leavis is key to this shift, especially his essay on Bentham and Richards.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@evankindley My go-to was Leavis' reply to Snow 'Two Cultures.' Any chance you can conjure the name of the essay ur referring to?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@peligrietzer @evankindley It has Bentham in the title. From Scrutiny, early 1930s. Very early.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.