@HeerJeet I really don't know, to be honest. So much of what we take as immutable and constant like causality might only be local phenomena
-
-
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@HeerJeet or perhaps common properties extend across all possible spacetimes. Multiversal laws? My tiny hominid brain will never know :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@Adam_Stirling But it does seem to me some form of philosophical Buddhism not far from atheism. Maybe reincarnation is problem1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@Adam_Stirling Interesting point. Can you be an idealist atheist. Idealist in sense of believing consciousness causes reality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@HeerJeet I've always thought of atheism as more a model that posited there was nothing at the helm of our reality, that we were observers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@HeerJeet raises an interesting question though: are concepts such as beauty or justice any less valid if invented by us, rather than a god?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Adam_Stirling
@Adam_Stirling I don't think so myself: the order we create is in dialogue with reality (or at least our local reality), so rich & complex.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Adam_Stirling Right: the idea of any being -- even a God -- can encompass infinity seems absurd when you think of it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.