17. Ghomeshi the untouchable star was one side of CBC class divide. On other side was his staff.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
18. In the neo-liberal CBC, the staff were the precariat -- contract workers, interns, people with precarious, temporary status.
7 replies 38 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
19. For the abusive star, being surrounded by an army of precariat workers, many of them young women, was ideal opportunity.
1 reply 24 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
20. Within the precariat, class solidarity is weak: people are always being shifted around, jobs are temporary.
2 replies 23 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
21. Lacking class solidarity or culture of resistance, precariat workers are easily abused by abusive star.
1 reply 14 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
22. Beyond these structural factors, there is individual responsibility. We need to know the names of the managers who winked at abuse.
2 replies 11 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
23. The Ghomeshi scandal should be a moment of profound soul searching at CBC. What has it become, that it allowed this to happen?
4 replies 38 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
24. As always, awareness of structural context has to be balanced by equal acknowledgement of personal agency & responsibility.
1 reply 16 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
25. At heart of personal agency is Ghomeshi himself, then his enablers, including especially those who set policy.
2 replies 7 retweets 7 likes
@AnthSmith Yes. I had mentioned that when scandal first broke. Might return to it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.