Doubt it. @SamHarrisOrg is a scientist, not an essentialist. Do you have a link? @MJtheProphet @Zetherin @OpheliaBenson
-
-
Replying to @AtheistStoned1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @MJtheProphet
Ah, you mean this http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2014/09/12/can-atheist-sam-harris-become-a-spiritual-figure/ … "instrinsically" LOL
@MJtheProphet@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin@OpheliaBenson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtheistStoned
A "critical posture" can have "intrinsic" properties, people don't.
@MJtheProphet@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin@OpheliaBenson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtheistStoned
@AtheistStoned@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin@OpheliaBenson So a posture can be intrinsically male, but that doesn't say things about women? Bull.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MJtheProphet
"to some degree" says nothing about individual women.
@MJtheProphet@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin@OpheliaBenson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtheistStoned
@AtheistStoned@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin@OpheliaBenson That's the point. It's a blanket statement about the nature of women. A wrong one.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @MJtheProphet
Sam Harris really is ridiculous.
@MJtheProphet@OpheliaBenson@AtheistStoned@SamHarrisOrg@Zetherin3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @KathaPollitt
@KathaPollitt Between Dawkins and Harris, I might end up converting to Catholicism.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
@KathaPollitt Well, as gender balance shifts among public atheists, problem might solve itself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.