-
-
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod@KevinNR Sure, it's debatable by people who want to inflict misery on people living under occupation. But not by moral people.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod When I was in Israel I heard Israelis talk about how Palestinians need to suffer more. So, yes, intention to inflict misery.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod Everything can be debated. Question is how are those responsibilities defined by international law & norms.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod There are in fact different types of nationalism, some of which are compatible with international law & human rights norms.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@CK_MacLeod The word "nationalism" really describes a variety of ideas, related to a country's unity, independence, or identity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@HeerJeet@CK_MacLeod For example, Pierre Trudeau was certainly a staunch Canadian nationalist, and a believer in universal human rights.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@EricKleefeld @CK_MacLeod Exactly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.