@CK_MacLeod @delong @DylanByers No: my view is that Byers micro reading of video of event he wasn't at ignores huge swaths of evidence.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet the "micro-reading" takes charges one by one and debunks them - you yourself concede M's depiction imperfect@delong@DylanByers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod@delong@DylanByers Byers's critique is bunch of quibbles. Original report wasn't a full transcript.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet general question of "acceptability" of Gaffney, Gabriel et al is different, possibly an illiberal question@delong@DylanByers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod@delong@DylanByers Ideological context behind panel is worth knowing in report on panel.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet a general excuse to ignore anything one's opponents *ever* has to say, a politics of blanket ad hominem@delong@DylanByers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod@DylanByers If question is whether event was anti-Muslim, long history of Gaffney & Gabriel of being anti-Muslim relevant1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet question put by Milbank was of "ugly" attack on actual Muslim, not of general ideological position (untag@delong@DylanByers?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod If I were Ahmed I would've felt that I was being personally attacked by panelists (particularly Gabriel) & by crowd.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@CK_MacLeod Try to exercise some imaginative empathy. Minorities know how to smile in emotionally tense situations where are outnumbered
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.