1. Having watched this video, I'm shocked that Politico & others see it as exculpatory of Heritage event:http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/06/17/video-heritage-foundations-benghazi-panelists-m/199750 …
-
-
10. Byers critique of Milbank seems heavily focused on use of verbs ("pounced" & "demanded"). Back-seat editing.
-
11. About Byers critique I'll just say that when I want close-reading textual analysis, I'll stick to Leavis and Empson.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet It would have been a good question if the topic had been something involving say the Iraq war & the panelists had been impartial. -
@BrendaCostello5 No, panelists framed Benghazi as part of larger war on terror, so Ahmed's question highly relevant. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.