1. @Sulliview critique of Kinsley's Greenwald review raises interesting question:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/publiceditor/2014/05/27/kinsley-greenwald-and-government-secrets/?_php=true,true&_type=blogs,blogs&smid=tw-share&_r=1 …
-
-
@HeerJeet i think a statement was probably needed from the RE given he specifically denied, in their pages, something pottery fundamentalThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@jaytingle I take the point about editorial intervention but readers filter writing all time by assessing arguments.
End of conversation
-
-
-
@HeerJeet it now almost a ritual any NYT controversy ends with the comment from the Public Editor.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
7.
@Sulliview's critique of Kinsley makes sense in terms of review's logical flaws but not sure it is public editors job to critique style -
.
@HeerJeet@delong@Sulliview "not sure it is public editors job to critique style". All human judgements are aesthetic. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.