@Ali_Gharib The "irrelevant" part is most important. Between them and the Pahlavi family, a lot of time wasted on Iran non-issues.
-
-
Replying to @DougSaunders
@DougSaunders Did you ever read Connie Bruck's 2006 piece on royalists and the MEK? The latter is too far out there even for the former.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ali_Gharib
@Ali_Gharib Yeah, I remember that. A parallel universe where the MEK had won power in '79 would not be an improved world.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DougSaunders
@DougSaunders@Ali_Gharib I did some reporting on MEK a decade ago. They were a big source of false intelligence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Ali_Gharib
@Ali_Gharib@HeerJeet It was this (@lrozen has the online byline but it was joint with@HeerJeet as I recall) http://prospect.org/article/prince-and-dissident …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DougSaunders
@DougSaunders@Ali_Gharib@lrozen Yes, Laura & I did a cluster of articles about Iran. Perhaps worth revisiting.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@DougSaunders@lrozen I remember this piece. Didn't realize you were a co-auth (weird that your byline's not there).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ali_Gharib
@Ali_Gharib That's a glitch on the Prospect website (in bio at bottom both Laura & I credited). No matter.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Ali_Gharib No, haven't read yet, but it's on my to do list.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.