3. Some comparative perspective: in 1960s & after, there were plenty of anti-abortion Democrats & some pro-choice Republicans.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. In USA, political parties really only started sorting themselves on social issues in 1970s (McGovern & Reagan being bellwethers).
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. In Canada, ideological sorting on social issues took longer -- really only started getting under way in 1990s. Why the delay?
4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. For a variety of reasons, 2 major Canadian political formations (Liberals & Cons) preferred to be ambiguous on social issues til 1990s.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. On Liberal side: party's based skewed Catholic & included rural areas, so they preferred to be ambiguous on social issues.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. On Conservative side of things, at least under Mulroney, party made overtures to feminists (i.e. selecting Kim Campbell as 1st female PM)
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
9. Aside from decisions of party, also key role of social movements. In USA evangelical leaders made conscious decision to go GOP in 1970s
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. In Canada evangelical right weaker & anti-abortion movement more Catholic in orientation. Didn't support making this partisan issue.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RichardFeren
@RichardFeren@HeerJeet But Catholic Liberals were post-Quiet Revolution "Catholics", like Trudeau. Not consulting with the bishop.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ImitationJordan @RichardFeren PET's combination of great personal faith with pure liberal principles in public life is very interesting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.