The two most important empirical premises of @chrislhayes Keystone argument have collapsed. He doesn't seem aware. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/04/chris-hayes-is-not-making-sense-on-keystone.html …
-
-
Replying to @jonathanchait
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes It's actually a very complicated strategic organizing question. "Name the adversary" is, as Chris says, usually2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes a smart, galvanizing play. And if it then leads to a campaign victory, then that victory will likely embolden2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes the advocates for large scale reform. Which will create more pressure for Obama to make the regulatory moves Jon1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes describes. But, in general, it is not a good idea to organize around hyped up dangers which don't really1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes warrant the level of political opposition one is trying to generate. One big problem with doing this: if you1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes lose, then activists think, ironically, that the defeat is actually more crushing and significant than it is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@jonathanchait@chrislhayes In which case, they might well lose focus on pushing hard for the reforms that remain quite possible to achieve.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@yeselson @jonathanchait @chrislhayes Minor point but Keystone delays likely to have positive impact in Canada 1/2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.