14. As I was usefully reminded, Flanagan does say attack on Paul Martin was "demagogic." So that's good.
-
-
24. Flanagan's original remarks not so much wrong as glib, ill-informed, & thoughtless. Which is a problem when talking about child abuse
-
@HeerJeet They were basically a mansplanation on an extremely sensitive topic. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet Life is too short for me to read MW, but the critical point seems that TF was a career 'expert' on FN, not just a general pundit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet surely CBC gave FT the boot b/c of revelations but also b/c INM had made it clear that there were outstanding FN commentators 1/2 -
@AdelePerry Think that's true & also explains why Wente & others defending TF: they feel their monopoly on punditry is eroding.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet and here they were with a disreputable and discredited codger (drawing a full academic salary).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.