2. If you are going to defend someone who made controversial remarks, you have to fairly quote or describe those remarks. Wente fails to do.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Flanagan got in trouble for saying "I do have some grave doubts about putting people in jail because of their taste in pictures"
1 reply 4 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Flanagan also said: "we put people in jail for doing something in which they do not harm another person."
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. Wente's gloss: Flanagan opposes 3 to 6 months in jail for "someone caught with an obscene Japanese comic book.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Wente's gloss is false. Flanagan was talking about photos of children being raped, not "a Japanese comic book."
4 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. A proper discussion of these issues would make distinction between works of imagination (which do no harm) and photos (which do)
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. A photo of child being abused is in fact a photo of a crime, circulation of which is reasonably seen as a harm to victim.
5 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
9. Wente and Flanagan both conflate censorship with criticism. Fact that people strenuously criticized Flanagan is not in fact censorship.
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. One legitimate free speech issue is University of Calgary's actions. Should not have criticized Flanagan but said has right to opinion
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
11.
@marksholdice: "Flanagan also once issued a press release saying: 'Paul Martin supports child pornography?' which Wente ignores."3 replies 2 retweets 1 like
12. Wente alludes to Flanagan feeling contrite for his role in all creating political culture of personal destruction but is it true?
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
13. I haven't read Flanagan's book yet. Does he specifically apologize for smearing Paul Martin as supporter of child porn?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
14. As I was usefully reminded, Flanagan does say attack on Paul Martin was "demagogic." So that's good.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.