@EricKleefeld Yeah, that was intent, but cannibalism & castration stuff comes off differently than RAH intended.
-
-
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld Yeah, it's a real problem. But RAH's heart was in right place. His 1950s books very progressive in having multi-racial cast.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld There is something moving about how RAH in 1940s and 1950s was trying to imagine a post-racist and post-sexist future.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld Yes. I'm reviewing the big new RAH bio. Fascinating political trajectory, from left of New Deal to Goldwater.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@EricKleefeld The Social Credit back door, available to populists & oddball intellectuals of all kinds.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @notjessewalker
@notjessewalker@HeerJeet Heinlein flirted with Social Credit ("Beyond This Horizon") but became a tight-money guy. ("Time Enough For Love")1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EricKleefeld
@EricKleefeld@HeerJeet Right—it was a door, not a destination.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@notjessewalker @EricKleefeld Heinlein also had a lot of Social Credit in first reak novel For Us, The Living (only published posthumously)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.