12. Johnson's Tory critique of the American Revolution hit a nerve that is still raw: liberty was conceived of as liberty for some, not all
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
13. The slave owner did not see himself as a feudal master, but as heir to Locke, Jefferson & Jackson: a free man.
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
14. The defense of slavery drew heavily on Lockean notions of property rights: to abolish slavery meant ending a kind of freedom.
1 reply 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
15. Again, sociologically & not in the abstract, white Americans pre-1865 knew they were free because they weren't black slaves.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
16. Notions of freedom weren't abstract but gender and racially specific: not the free person but the free (white) man.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
17. Of course, there's been tremendous struggle to expand the idea of "the free (white) man" to become "the free person" but also lag.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
18. Classical liberalism was blind on these gender & race problems, which modern liberalism & social democracy have sought to solve.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
19. One problem with libertarianism is that they refuse to see how limited classical liberalism was and why it needed to be modified.
4 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
20. J.S. Mill, greatest of the classical liberals, came to realize limits of creed & made steps towards social democracy & feminism.
2 replies 4 retweets 7 likes
@EricKleefeld Fair point, although I think Mill can be claimed by both social democrats & social liberals.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.