Also, maybe one of the perils of general interest mags. Write for SUCH a wide audience, you bore anyone vaguely familiar with the subject.
-
-
Replying to @nickhunebrown
@nickhunebrown The NYer (which I love/hate) often seems hostile to the idea that ppl may have read deeply about things elsewhere.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nathanwhitlock
@nathanwhitlock I didn't read the ScarJo piece, but I do remember being deeply outraged by some ignorant piece on poutine.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nickhunebrown
@nickhunebrown A magazine's style guide is a window into its soul. The NYer's is willfully anachronistic and haughty.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @nathanwhitlock
@nathanwhitlock @nickhunebrown That feature (assuming people havne't read anything else) is deeply embedded in NYers DNA. 1/2
4:19 PM - 3 Apr 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.