2. Philip Roth wrote a string of middling, flawed & terrible books in the early 1970s (Great American Novel, Our Gang, My Life as a Man)
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Flawed Roth novels were a necessary stage where he worked out his outrageous comic spiel & anger, before more controlled Zuckerman series
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Updike's Rabbit Redux is weakest of book of series (especially utterly unconvincing engagement with black radicalism & hippies) BUT ...
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. ...with Redux, Updike became more ambitious. Rabbit, Run was narrow book but Redux & later books tried to encompass USA
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. "Something I've Been Meaning to Tell You" is Alice Munro's weakest collection, a book of uncertain, undeveloped stories.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Yet with "Something" Munro broke with her earlier reflexive habit of epiphanic endings, shuffling narrative deck: seeds of great work.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. We have to fail to succeed: writers have to risk writing atrocious books in order to get the courage to do their best work.
6 replies 7 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sternbergh
@sternbergh The slower you are, the higher the stakes, which makes you slow down even more: the Ralph Ellison story.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@sternbergh Yeah, my tweeter stream about bad books about good writers is in some ways about virtues of being prolific
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.