3. Flawed Roth novels were a necessary stage where he worked out his outrageous comic spiel & anger, before more controlled Zuckerman series
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Updike's Rabbit Redux is weakest of book of series (especially utterly unconvincing engagement with black radicalism & hippies) BUT ...
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. ...with Redux, Updike became more ambitious. Rabbit, Run was narrow book but Redux & later books tried to encompass USA
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. "Something I've Been Meaning to Tell You" is Alice Munro's weakest collection, a book of uncertain, undeveloped stories.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Yet with "Something" Munro broke with her earlier reflexive habit of epiphanic endings, shuffling narrative deck: seeds of great work.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. We have to fail to succeed: writers have to risk writing atrocious books in order to get the courage to do their best work.
6 replies 7 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. Middle period Dickens isn't bad but it's often flawed, thwarted or not quite cohesive: Barnaby Rudge, Old Curiosity Shop, even Chuzzlewit
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. Yet in his middling middle-period works we see Dickens figuring out how to organize a big novel, preparing for Bleak House, etc.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. It's impossible to overstate how wretched those last few Heinlein novels are. "Number of the Beast": still shudder to think on it.
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@brianmooredraws Don't remind me!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.