@yeselson @HeerJeet Rich, I'm not denying the existence of those anxieties at all. But the existence of (cont) http://tl.gd/n_1rrkdta
-
-
Replying to @SethAckerman
@SethAckerman@HeerJeet Yes, all for structure. But you need to connect the structure--in this case to Phyllis Schlafly organizing lots of1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@SethAckerman@HeerJeet "traditional" women to oppose abortion rights and the ERA, and the the churches working together, to political2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@SethAckerman@HeerJeet But I'd like to see that spelled out. Not saying that it's an impossible argument--just saying that, just to focus1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@SethAckerman@HeerJeet on this one example for heuristic purposes, it's doesn't necessarily synch up.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SethAckerman
@SethAckerman@yeselson I feel like Twitter is not right form for hashing this out. Rich: can you blog your objections to Seth's articles?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@SethAckerman You're right about that--I'll clarify a bit something I've written privately perhaps that Seth has seen.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @SethAckerman
@SethAckerman@HeerJeet Ok, fair enough, I'll bow out. All quite interesting, vigorously and respectfully conducted.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@yeselson @SethAckerman Don't bow out -- write it out! Seth's article was important & would love to see your extended reply.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.