-
-
-
@alon_levy@delong I'll have to read Lichtman. I think there was still some part of GOP (and conservatism) that was anti-racist in 1920s - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet Slightly diff. subject (timing/nature of partisan switch on civil rights), but reminds me of this article: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/feinstein/files/sapd.pdf … -
@notstevenwhite Slightly different but related. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamWangPhD Don't have any reference for that one -- it's my own argument based on reading 1950s conservatives.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamWangPhD@HeerJeet Not reference, but context:https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/371028354578644993 … -
@PaulHRosenberg@SamWangPhD Context is that northern conservative intellectuals pre-1950s didn't necessarily feel affinity for South. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@SamWangPhD@HeerJeet Point is, natural alignment tendency wasn't universal pre-50s. Ideology expresses itself in historically defined ways. -
@PaulHRosenberg@SamWangPhD Right. There are periods where northern business elites favored civil rights (Civil War & early Reconstruction)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamWangPhD@HeerJeet An illustrative example: the rise of ethno-fascism in post-civil rights era described in *The Beast Reawakens*.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.