Tom Flanagan says he's not sure merely watching child porn does harm to others: http://o.canada.com/2013/02/28/tom-flanagan-is-okay-with-child-pornography/#.US-LeqLvugY …. (h/t @iainmarlow)
@nspector4 @simonhoupt @iainmarlow That's a separate matter and Flanagan didn't make that distinction.
-
-
@HeerJeet@simonhoupt@iainmarlow fact is the law does not treat it as separate mattet -
@nspector4@simonhoupt@iainmarlow Sure. But then F could have argued for amending law to make distinction between photos & illustrations. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.