Tom Flanagan says he's not sure merely watching child porn does harm to others: http://o.canada.com/2013/02/28/tom-flanagan-is-okay-with-child-pornography/#.US-LeqLvugY …. (h/t @iainmarlow)
-
-
@HeerJeet@iainmarlow I presume he's trying to argue that passive viewing doesn't encourage the production of the porn. Which is wrong. -
@simonhoupt@iainmarlow Yep, completely, stupidly wrong. The consumers are part of network that extends to production.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet@simonhoupt@iainmarlow drawings, illustrations -
@nspector4@simonhoupt@iainmarlow That's a separate matter and Flanagan didn't make that distinction. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.