For people who dont want to be hopelessly pretentious I now propose replacing 'intellectually dishonest' with 'dishonest'. Youre welcome
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative Unless u mean in the sense of one applies to writing in small magazine & debating in the context of trying to get tenure1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshtpm
@joshtpm@normative No! George Will global warming columns are intellectually dishonest. Nixon's lies about Watergate just dishonest.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@normative so ID is D through sophisticated argument whereas D is just pedestrian lie2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshtpm
@joshtpm@normative Yeah, that's my understanding, although maybe Julian has his own take on it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@normative well, that's my point. that's not a difference.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@joshtpm@heerjeet in the science community we would just call it dishonest. In punditry we use ID to give the idiot an out.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.