@yeselson way of thinking not as merely an exception or unfortunate stain, but constitutive of an entire tradition.
-
-
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin Have not read, will try to do that. I don't think we disagree so much as we emphasizing different analytical tropes. Both valid.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin Just ordered Rogers Smith. I see Foner praised. Am interested in how a polo scientist handles theme, compared to historian.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin@yeselson of conservative populism running from Jefferson to Jackson to confederacy to New Right. He hated Lincoln.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@coreyrobin I've heard of Bradford. Have to go Genovese to prompt me to actually read him! My failure for sure.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
@yeselson@CoreyRobin Genovese loved Bradford. They both bought into Lost Cause myth. Bizarre & sad end for an Italian-American Marxist.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin@heerjeet Ok--see you later. Interesting stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@yeselson @CoreyRobin Yeah, thanks for the thought-inspiring discussion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.