Not that there is anything wrong with porn, but you don't expect it in the NY Review of Books.
@faceattack The Cadmus painting reprinted here (I especially like the positioning of the bicycle seat): http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/oct/25/is-there-good-way-be-gay/?pagination=false …
-
-
@HeerJeet I saw that! I didn’t think pornographic, more “racy”. Didn’t notice the bike seat. Cheeky! -
@faceattack Pornographic is perhaps overstating it, but it's highly sexualized painting. Notice also the baguette. Lots of phallic symbols. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.