Another 14,000 words from Perry Anderson on Indian history (the partition). Have to set aside a long break for this: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v34/n14/perry-anderson/why-partition …
-
-
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin Because Nehru as secular rationalist can be criticized by Weberian ethics of responsibility as religious Gandhi can't be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @CoreyRobin
@CoreyRobin So part of the purpose of the article is to undermine myths of Congress Party, which means going after Nehru.
7:50 PM - 23 Jul 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.