This piece is just a highbrow version of the "my husband is a lazy useless piece of shit but I love him anyway" 'joke'https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/05/opinion/marriage-satisfaction-love.html …
-
-
They lift the patriarchy from Catholic doctrine, w/o the philosophical underpinnings. Birth control banned, divorce banned or impossible. WHY? Evangelicals: it preserves patriarchy. Aquinas: everything in nature exists for a purpose and the purpose of sex is for children.
-
2/ Without Aquinas' metaphysics, the rules mean nothing. With Aquinas, Darwin means nothing. Since Darwin, we know that nature is not purpose driven to an end, it's just what works. Times piece can be boiled down to we stay married for the children. Women as means to a purpose.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

