I remember not too long ago, The Bulwark said Singal was “nobody’s idea of a conservative” and then it really hit home with me how little most people pay attention to trans issues
-
-
-
Cathy Young, another charmer. And the article is basically "we all can find common cause by exterminating trans people" (which is her brand). But that's what makes Singal so awful: he cultivates this "just asking questions" so nobody will really think about what he's saying.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is the Times inviting one member of a particular "in" group to give their supposedly critical assessment of another member of the exact same "in" group. It's useless. And the particular "different idea" here is not that far from "exterminate the brutes".
- Show replies
-
-
-
Lol he’s going to go through a whole case of diapers over this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's like the pot reviewing the kettle's new work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The editors' selection of Jesse Signal to review the book of a prominent anti-trans author tells you everything you need to know. But of course this is typical for the Times; as I recall there was a ~recent controversy with their choice of a Kissinger apologist as book reviewer.
-
There are like 15 people who subscribe to the times who aren't kissinger apologistd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No fuckin’ way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You signed the Harper’s letter with him
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.