One issue with major discourse participants (or signifiers) being podcast hosts is that no one actually critically listens to podcasts, there’s just too much unless you’re, like, media matters, so everyone forms their opinions from non-audio stuff or what people tell them
-
-
is there still a role for a big name "public intellectual" art or theatre critic the likes of Ruskin, Arnold, Robert Hughes, Kael, even Roger Ebert?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.