Greenwald's defense of Carlson is just sickeningly dishonest.pic.twitter.com/VUarUGLSIQ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Why is it so hard to draw lines w.r.t. engaging with those who are increasingly shown to be of bad faith, rhetorically reckless, or evil? I imagine someone sitting in an extermination camp thinking "At least I was never rude and always willing to engage in cordial debate."
p.s. I only debate this with you because I follow and respect you. I would never debate with someone like Greenwald. Giving him my attention and good faith, even in opposition, is itself his victory. i.e. What counter argument do you feel he gave the slightest consideration to?
What is the use of presenting counter arguments to someone who is "sickeningly dishonest"? It's just platforming disinformation. Meet the Press 2.0.
Same fig leaf GG uses regarding appearances on Fox News.
I agree, taking this to the next logical step, that Glenn is a lib
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.