What's fascinating here is the use of the word "strong." I would say a party that has achieved an amazing constitutional revolution of overturning a 50 year old decision, an achievement that took a focused movement overturning norms over decades, is "strong."https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1523812812434329602 …
-
-
The basic idea as I understand it is that parties need to represent the needs of a broad public, and adapt itself to these needs to compete for voters. The problems happen when parties are captured by extreme outsider groups (Republicans) or competing insider factions (Dems)
-
But likely you'd get a less crude understanding from
@daschloz@sam_rosenfeld or@lara_putnam@hahriehan@Daniel_J_Galvin , who are much more deeply engaged with these questions than I am, and disagree on lots but have some important elements of shared analysis. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.