The elite freak-out over what all evidence suggest are reasonable and even restrained exercises of free speech is really amazing.https://twitter.com/marynmck/status/1523853788414717952 …
-
-
I'm pretty sure people think protesting at someone's private residence is always implicitly threatening
-
Nope. People protest outside Pelosi and Schumer's place -- and Manchin's yacht -- all the time. It's normal as normal can be.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nah. It's good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m also struck by the similarities between What’s happening now and January 6. If lawmakers were indeed being threatened in both situations, shouldn’t there be a similar reaction to what’s happening now? Where were the unanimous consent bills then?
-
Lol - these protesters aren’t armed - breaking into the house to kill
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Madsen v. Women’s health care center inc. 1994 ruling on protesting at the homes of abortion providers and nurses:pic.twitter.com/wytYH7vVCa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s what I explained to the family when I burned a cross on the sidewalk outside their house.
-
Nobody is burning a cross. You're making things up because reality doesn't match your hysterical persecution fantasies.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wine and cheese at a protest? That's the most American thing ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What? Going to their homes like they are is meant to be intimidation. They are saying they want to influence the judges decision.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.