The only real argument against peacefully protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices is a tactical one. It might be counter-productive (or might not be -- who knows). There's no principled reason in a free society not to do it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
In terms of whether this sort of protest (outside homes of SCOTUS justices or politicians) is right move, I think the critics would be on stronger grounds if they offered a counter-strategy.
Show this thread -
In the long run, the only political strategy that makes sense is activism to force Dems on state and federal level to vote to codify Roe (and indeed protections beyond Roe). But that's the work of many elections.
Show this thread -
Once the actual decision is released, I suspect protests will move on from justices to politicians. Where I think there might be some efficacy.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Apartment building”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anti choice advocates have been protesting in front of doctors and politicians' homes for decades, and they're winning. Of course the same types would say, don't protest in front of homes of people I support
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.