this just obfuscateshttps://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1521334699221823488 …
-
-
You do realize the senate doesn’t work like in Canada, right? They don’t owe the President anything, they’re not appointed by the prime minister.
-
So a party with 60 senators can't get enough votes to defend constitutional rights that are in fact wildly popular? Isn't that kind of pathetic? You guys are really addicted to defending a feckless party that refuses to take action on anything.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How would codifying Roe have prevented the Court from overturning Roe?
-
Because even if the case is overturned the law remains in place. Is this a real question?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Question: Did all 60 of those Democrats that Obama “had” support codifying Roe into law?

-
You don't really even need 60 if you are willing to over-ride the filibuster (for which you only need 50). Is it your position that the Dems never had 50 votes to entrench Roe into law?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
obama had sixty senators between september and january of 2009
-
er sorry january of 2010
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The handful of distant universes where Obama gets Roe codified probably do not also have the ACA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.