Post-Vietnam is probably a good guess
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe during the Tillerson era gutting/mass exodus?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it’s gone back and forth. Madeline Albright was more hawkish than William Cohen while Donald Rumsfeld was more hawkish than Colin Powell.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Pentagon resisted involvement in Central America under Reagan. The State Department was considerably more hawkish in the early 80's that the Joint Chiefs were.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure if anyone has. But you are spot on. Time for you to wrote a long article and convert it into a book?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really what you're looking for, but I remember articles like this starting mid 2000s The State Department, Not the Pentagon, Should Lead America's Public Diplomacy Efforts http://brook.gs/2bHbUc1 via
@BrookingsInstThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Likely with George Shultz who'd make obscene gestures, instead of speaking coherently. His verbal militancy was also related to his relative lack of influence compared to Weinberg's DoD.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably post Iraq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shuttering of USIA/USIS and then running straight into the WoT? People who didn’t want to defend Abu Ghraib and Gitmo didn’t have much to stick around for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Henry Kissinger has entered the chat
-
I found Henry, sir!
@dick_nixon
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.